International Response to Palestinian Casualties: Comprehensive Analysis

Overview: Insufficient Action Against Documented Atrocities Despite overwhelming international documentation of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, the international response to Palestinian casualties since October 7, 2023 has been largely ineffectual in stopping the violence or providing accountability. While multiple international organizations have issued detailed findings, the mechanisms to enforce these determinations remain weak or non-existent. The United States' repeated use of its veto power in the UN Security Council has effectively shielded Israel from binding international action.doctorswithoutborders+2

BLEEDING UMMAHPOLITICSGOVERNMENT

Abdur Sami

11/4/202510 min read

Download Full Article

a very tall building with lots of windows

United Nations Security Council: Blocked at Every Turn

The UN Security Council, the only body capable of issuing legally binding resolutions, has passed only 4 ceasefire or humanitarian resolutions out of 14 proposed since October 7, 2023. This record of failure reflects one fundamental reality: the United States has vetoed 6+ ceasefire resolutions, often voting alone against the other 14 Council members.news .un+5

Key Security Council Actions:

December 8, 2023 - US Veto: The first ceasefire resolution proposed by Russia and China was vetoed by the United States, despite the death toll already exceeding 20,000.jewishvirtuallibrary+1

March 25, 2024 - Resolution 2728: After months of obstruction, the Security Council finally passed Resolution 2728, which called for an immediate ceasefire during Ramadan (leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire) and demanded the unconditional release of hostages. The resolution passed 14-0 with the United States abstaining—a significant diplomatic shift. However, Doctors Without Borders noted that "a two-week ceasefire is not nearly enough time" and that previous humanitarian resolutions (2712 and 2720) had been "largely disregarded" by Israel.wikipedia+2

February 20, 2024 and November 20, 2024 - Additional Vetoes: The US continued blocking ceasefire resolutions even as conditions worsened. On November 20, 2024, the US cast its fourth veto against a ceasefire resolution, with all 14 other Council members voting in favor—a 14-1 margin. By September 24, 2025, the US had vetoed its sixth ceasefire resolution as famine conditions officially spread.aljazeera+1

Overall Impact: Despite passing some resolutions, the Security Council's effectiveness has been severely undermined. As UN Ambassador representing non-permanent members noted after the September 2025 veto: "14 members of this Council have sent a clear message" supporting a ceasefire, yet the veto system prevents action. Secretary-General António Guterres confirmed in January 2025 that the humanitarian response in Gaza was "completely dependent" on UNRWA, yet the Council could not compel Israel to allow the agency to operate.press .un+1

UN General Assembly: Overwhelming Support, No Enforcement

The UN General Assembly has passed multiple non-binding resolutions with overwhelming majorities, but lacking the Security Council's enforcement powers, these resolutions carry no legal weight.globalaffairs+2

December 12, 2023: The General Assembly passed a ceasefire resolution by 158-9 with 13 abstentions, calling for an "immediate and sustained humanitarian truce".pbs

June 12, 2025: The General Assembly voted 149-12 (19 abstentions) to demand "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" in Gaza, accusing Israel of using "starvation of civilians as a method of warfare".fdd

December 11-12, 2024: Two landmark resolutions passed with near-unanimous support:

Ceasefire Resolution: 158-9 demanding immediate permanent ceasefirepbs
UNRWA Support Resolution: 159-9 affirming UNRWA's mandate and deploring Israel's laws banning the agency's operationspbs

September 19, 2024: Following the ICJ's July advisory opinion, the General Assembly voted to affirm the Court's findings and demanded that Israel "bring to an end without delay its unlawful presence" in the occupied Palestinian territory within 12 months—a deadline that Israel has ignored with no consequences.diakonia

Overall Impact: Scholar analysis notes that "17 resolutions against the State of Israel" were passed in 2024 alone, compared to only 6 targeting other nations—yet these remain toothless without Security Council backing. As one analyst noted, the US remains "extremely isolated" in its opposition, yet this isolation has not translated into enforcement mechanisms.aljazeera+1

International Court of Justice: Historic Rulings, No Compliance

The ICJ has issued landmark decisions declaring Israel's occupation unlawful and ordering binding provisional measures, yet enforcement mechanisms remain virtually non-existent, with Israel largely disregarding the Court's orders.

January 26, 2024 - Provisional Measures: In response to South Africa's genocide case, the ICJ issued six binding provisional measures ordering Israel to:icj+1

Take all measures to prevent genocidal acts
Prevent the military from committing acts within the Genocide Convention scope
Take effective measures to preserve evidence of genocide
Report to the Court within one month on compliance measures
Prevent and punish direct and public incitement to genocide
Take immediate and effective measures to enable humanitarian assistance

Amnesty International called this "an authoritative reminder of the crucial role of international law" in preventing genocide. However, Human Rights Watch documented that by February 26, 2024—just one month after the order—Israel was already in non-compliance, with restrictions on humanitarian aid continuing and 3,400 additional Palestinians killed between January 26 and February 23.arabcenterdc+2

May 24, 2024 - Emergency Additional Orders: As famine conditions developed, the ICJ issued additional emergency orders requiring Israel to "ensure basic food supplies, without delay". Israel again largely disregarded these orders.wikipedia+1

July 19, 2024 - Advisory Opinion on Occupation: The ICJ issued a landmark advisory opinion finding that Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory is unlawful because it violates Palestinian rights to self-determination and violates the prohibition on territorial acquisition by force. The Court held 11-4 that Israel must:cambridge

Bring its unlawful presence in the OPT "to an end as rapidly as possible"
Cease all new settlement activities
Evacuate all settlers from the OPT
Make reparation for damage causeddiakonia+1

The opinion also found that all States are obligated to:

Refuse to recognize the legality of Israel's presence
Refrain from giving aid or assistance in maintaining the illegal situation
Take lawful measures to ensure Israel's compliance with international lawdiakonia

No Implementation: Despite this landmark ruling, Israel has continued and intensified settlement activities in the West Bank and maintained military control of Gaza. The 12-month deadline set by the General Assembly (September 2024 resolution) for Israeli withdrawal passed by November 2025 with no compliance.globalr2p+1

October 22, 2025 - UNRWA Advisory Opinion: The ICJ issued another advisory opinion finding that Israel must provide "unconditional" and unhindered humanitarian assistance through UNRWA. Yet by November 2025, Israel had allowed only minimal UNRWA operations, with the agency facing operational closure.hrw

Overall Impact: The ICJ's orders are binding on countries that accept its jurisdiction (both Israel and South Africa do formally accept ICJ rulings), but the Court lacks enforcement mechanisms. As one analysis notes, "the lasting legacy of the advisory opinion may turn more on its contribution to the law of belligerent occupation than to any direct impact on resolution of the longstanding Israeli-Palestinian conflict," suggesting that its pronouncements "may fall on deaf ears".cambridge

International Criminal Court: Arrest Warrants Without Teeth

On November 21, 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, along with Hamas commander Mohammed Deif, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.hrw+1

Charges Against Israeli Leadership:

War crime of starvation as a method of warfarenews.un+1
Crimes against humanity: murder, persecution, and other inhumane actshrw+1
The judges concluded there were "reasonable grounds to believe" Netanyahu and Gallant bear "criminal responsibility"news.un

Significance: This marked a historic moment—the first time the ICC issued warrants for sitting Israeli leaders. International human rights organizations hailed the decision as "breaking through the perception that certain individuals are beyond the reach of the law".hrw

Critical Limitation: The ICC has no enforcement power. Countries must voluntarily arrest and transfer suspects, and many countries—including the United States and Israel itself—are not parties to the Rome Statute or oppose enforcement. As of November 2025, zero arrest warrants have been executed. Netanyahu, Gallant, and other Israeli officials have continued their positions with no consequences.wikipedia+1

Ongoing Investigation: The ICC prosecutor stated that "further applications for warrants of arrest" would likely be submitted as investigations continue, suggesting additional accountability mechanisms could be developed—though the weakness of existing enforcement remains evident.news .un

UN Commission of Inquiry: Extensive Documentation of Crimes

The UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has conducted parallel investigations into violations by both Israeli forces and Palestinian armed groups.

June 19, 2024 - Initial Report: The Commission found that:un+1

Israeli forces committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violations of international humanitarian law
Israel's total siege weaponized "life-sustaining necessities for strategic and political gains"
Israeli forces committed sexual and gender-based violence with intent to humiliate Palestinians
The Commission would share findings with the ICCaljazeera+1

October 9, 2024 - Major Genocide Findings: The Commission of Inquiry announced that it had concluded Israel committed four genocidal acts in Gaza with specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza. Commission Chair Navi Pillay stated:ohchryoutube

"Our analysis concluded that the state of Israel is responsible for the commission of four genocidal acts in Gaza with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza. We also found that the Israeli president, Prime Minister, and former defense minister have incited the commission of genocide."youtube

October 30, 2024 - Comprehensive Report: A six-month update presented grave concerns about:un

Treatment of Palestinian detainees including torture and ill-treatment
Sexual violence committed by Israeli forces
Obstruction of humanitarian access
Violations of international humanitarian law by both parties

The Commission urged Israel to:ohchr

Immediately cease targeting medical facilities, staff, and vehicles
End arbitrary detention and torture of Palestinians
Comply with ICJ directions on the occupation
Comply with ICJ provisional measures on genocideohchr

Limitations: Despite this extensive documentation, the Commission's findings are not legally binding on states. Governments are not obligated to enforce the Commission's recommendations or refer findings to prosecutorial bodies, though the Commission has cooperated with the ICC.un+1

UN Human Rights Council: Limited Authority

The UN Human Rights Council mandated investigations and issued reports documenting violations but lacks enforcement power.un+1

September 2025 Report: The Commission reported that Israeli officials demonstrated "a clear and consistent intent to establish permanent military control over Gaza and to change its demographic composition," including ethnic cleansing and settlement establishment.youtube

Limitations: The Council can issue resolutions and mandate investigations, but cannot impose sanctions or compel compliance. Israel denied access to investigators for most of the conflict period.un+1

Major Human Rights Organizations: Genocide Declarations

Amnesty International - December 4, 2024: Amnesty International published a landmark 296-page report concluding that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The organization found:amnesty+1

Israel intentionally destroyed Palestinians as a protected group
Evidence of killing, serious bodily harm, and deliberately inflicted conditions of life calculated to destroy the group
Genocidal intent demonstrated by dehumanizing statements from Israeli officials
The presence of Hamas fighters "does not absolve Israel from its obligations" to spare civiliansamnesty

Secretary-General Agnès Callamard stated: "Israel's intent is the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza...This is genocide. It must stop now."amnesty

Recommendations: Amnesty called for an immediate arms embargo, with states that continue supplying weapons to Israel becoming "at risk of becoming complicit in genocide".amnesty

Limitation: While influential, Amnesty's determination carries no legal force and arms have continued flowing to Israel.aljazeera+2

Human Rights Watch - December 2024: HRW documented acts amounting to extermination through deliberate deprivation of water, noting this constitutes both war crimes and acts of genocide.hrw

Israeli Organizations - July 2025: B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel became the first Israeli human rights organizations to formally conclude that Israel is committing genocide, describing it alongside apartheid in the West Bank.amnesty

Key Organizational Responses

Specific Cases of Failed International Protection

UNRWA Dismantling: Despite the General Assembly voting 159-9 to support UNRWA in December 2024 and the ICJ ordering Israel to allow it to operate in October 2025, Israel shut down UNRWA operations in January 2025, and the agency lost critical funding support from multiple countries.hrw+1

Healthcare Targeting: The Commission of Inquiry documented that Israel committed war crimes through deliberate attacks on hospitals. The WHO recorded 697 attacks on healthcare facilities, yet no enforcement actions were taken.who+1

Journalist Killings: At least 192-274 journalists have been killed, making Gaza "the deadliest conflict for journalists in recorded history," yet no accountability mechanisms have been effective.pbs+1

Starvation as Weapon: Multiple international bodies documented the use of starvation as a deliberate method of warfare, yet Israel's blockade has continued with only incremental humanitarian access increases.lieber.westpoint+2

Why International Response Failed: Structural Limitations

1. Veto Power in Security Council: The US veto has single-handedly prevented 6+ binding resolutions, rendering the only enforcement body ineffectual.doctorswithoutborders+3

2. Non-Binding Authority: UN General Assembly resolutions, while overwhelmingly supported, have no enforcement mechanism and can be ignored without consequence.globalaffairs+2

3. Weak ICJ Enforcement: ICJ orders are binding but unenforceable—countries must voluntarily comply, and Israel has largely disregarded multiple orders.hrw+2

4. ICC Powerlessness: Arrest warrants issued but unexecuted; no mechanism to compel arrest or transfer of suspects to The Hague.wikipedia+2

5. Access Denied: International investigators have been repeatedly blocked from entering Gaza and the West Bank to document violations.un+2

6. No Sanctions Regime: Despite genocide findings and arrest warrants, no international sanctions have been imposed on Israeli leaders or the state.

7. Arms Supplies Continue: Despite calls for arms embargoes, the US and other Western nations have continued supplying weapons to Israel, making them complicit under international law according to human rights organizations.amnesty+2

Conclusion: Documentation vs. Implementation Gap

The international community has produced unprecedented documentation of Palestinian casualties and violations of international law. The ICJ declared the occupation unlawful, the ICC issued arrest warrants for sitting leaders, the UN Commission documented genocide, and Amnesty International and Israeli NGOs formally determined genocidal intent. However, this extensive legal and factual record has translated into virtually zero enforcement.

The death toll has continued to rise from 20,000 in January 2024 to over 68,865 by November 2025, with estimates suggesting the true toll including indirect deaths could exceed 100,000. Meanwhile, Israel has ignored ICJ orders, continued military operations despite UN resolutions, dismissed arrest warrants, and intensified restrictions on humanitarian aid and UNRWA operations.

The fundamental failure lies not in lack of documentation but in the absence of enforcement mechanisms. International law has been rendered performative—declarations without consequences, orders without enforcement, and accountability mechanisms that cannot compel compliance. The US veto power in the Security Council has proven to be the decisive factor in preventing binding action, while other enforcement bodies lack the power to override state sovereignty. As a result, Palestinian casualties continue mounting despite the most extensive international legal determination of atrocities in recent history.

LIBOIC

Reviving Islamic knowledge for global understanding.

Unity

contact@liboic.org